New Ideas : Broadband.gov

US lagging behind in Broadband Speeds

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:38:46 PDT

The United States is behind in the broadband market and has needed to step it up when it comes to speeds and prices. You can get 100Mbps fiber connections in Japan for the same price as what a 15Mbps connection costs here in the US. If the provider's equipment can handle more speeds, then they should be required to boost speeds without increasing their prices.

I think that the FCC should make it mandatory for ISPs who provide fiber optic and cable connections to start their base speeds at 100Mbps and not a megabit lower. My 25Mbps fiber connection costs more than a 100Mbps connection in Japan ($65 for 25Mbps/US $50 for 100Mbps/Japan) In fact, I could be getting a 200Mbps fiber connection for only $55 in Japan and a 1Gbps connection for only $80 to show how big of a price difference there is between Japan and the US.

DSL providers should be required to provide at a minimum of 20Mbps. The providers who can't accomplish this speed due to distance factors should implement fiber to the node to help increase the availability and speeds of existing DSL services. Most DSL modems will support up to 25Mbps or more and right now, ISPs aren't even making it past 7Mbps and that's just ridiculous.

More and more people are relying on the availability of the Internet for business and general communication, but the problem in the United States is availability to remote areas that can be outside of 100 miles from the nearest rural and metropolitan areas. These areas may get only a small taste of broadband that is limited to around 1 to 3Mbps. Thanks to our government funding, we can eliminate this bottleneck and provide faster service for everyone.

Comments (0)Broadband Consumer Context, 100mbps, fiber, japan

Don't forget the backhaul connections

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:21:51 PDT

Vote On Idea

I'm a teleworker suffering from high-latency 3G access. I'd pay a lot for real Internet access instead of the low quality ATT and Verizon 3G - I have both since neither one works all the time.

Part of the problem is the backhaul connections are terribly oversubscribed. Verizon, ATT are happy to sell lots of 3G devices, but building the infrastructure cuts into their profits.

Create standards and requirements for backhaul infrastructure.

Comments (0)Wireless Broadband

Freedom to do whatever with our connection

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:17:52 PDT

Vote On Idea

We pay for our services, and a lot, yet most companies disallow you to do numerous things with the service you purchased! My big complaint with that is they do not allow the use of servers, at all, no matter how little traffic the server would get.

If we are paying for XMb/s, aren't we entitled to use it however we please?

Comments (0)Broadband Consumer Context

Bandwidth Squatting

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:01:24 PDT

Vote On Idea

Wireless broadband has the POTENTIAL of allowing true competition, assuming the radio bandwidth isn't all bought up and 'reserved' by corporations just for the sake of controlling it.

If a wireless or broadcast company buys up radio spectrum bandwidth from the FCC, but then doesn't SUBSTANTIALLY USE IT, that bandwidth should be re-auctioned.

In other words, if someone buys up all the VHF spectrum they can, just to prevent ANYONE ELSE from competing against their terrible borderline broadband service, then they should forfeit that excess bandwidth.

Even worse, buying federal bandwidth just to 'sublet' it should not be allowed. The FCC controls the spectrum, not some collection of corporations. Either YOU directly and responsibly provide a service, or YOU step aside and let someone else do something USEFUL with that dead air.

Comments (0)Wireless Broadband

Disaster Failover and Uninterruptible Power

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:48:20 PDT

Vote On Idea

'Satellite Broadband' may have a role as a 'failover' mode for local disasters that otherwise cut off sections of communities from the outside world. More Cellular broadband (i.e. 3G/4G/EVDO/etc.) towers should have uninterruptible power and a backup satellite uplink built in to provide at least emergency/911 services when disaster cuts off their power, and potentially fells their peers. At least they should have some means for local authorities to directly power them, and make 911 calls work. In the event of disaster, wireless services tend to remain operational for having less stuff to break.

This is a weakness of 'cable' and 'fiberoptic' VOIP systems. If you don't have power to the customer (or near the customer), then they don't have communications. The old copper phone systems can still be centrally powered by battery and generators, but cable MODEM and fiberoptic systems need batteries EVERYWHERE. In an extended power failure, those batteries will simply die, and communication will fail.

Comments (0)Public Safety & Homeland Security

Accountability

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:24:05 PDT

Vote On Idea

They were going to run glass to every doorstep 'by 2000' back in the 1990's. The big telecomm companies accepted boatloads of tax money to build that infrastructure.

THEY ELECTED NOT TO.

The 'Telecommunication Act of 1996' built huge monopolies instead of encourage competition. Deregulation simply moved tax money into private hands, to be spent on whatever private hands like. Like stock bonuses and perks and 'instant profits' to launder the money into personal income.

Put some teeth in it this time. Make them pay the money back with 20% INTEREST if they don't do what they're supposed to with the money. Otherwise, the money will 'disappear' again.

Comments (0)Best Practices/Big Ideas

FIX WHAT IS ALREADY THERE

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:17:37 PDT

Vote On Idea

In large unincorporated areas, such as in San Bernardino and Riverside counties in California, Verizon has bought up lots of small town phone companies, centralized everything, and then allowed ALL of the thousands of miles of equipment to ROT.

You can beg for service from some guy overseas with an unintelligible accent to tell you it will be a month or more for anyone to do anything about it. Cables are coming up out of the ground and getting shredded by vehicle traffic. Boxes and hanging cables are held together with duct and electrical tape.

It's more profitable to let it rot and charge people the same rates for bad service. Maybe it should not be this way.

Comments (0)Fixed Broadband, maintenance repair

'Unlimited'

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:11:42 PDT

Vote On Idea

If a carrier claims 'unlimited' broadband, why are they allowed to then LIMIT IT? Either by charging criminally high rates, or by cutting service off, or by other methods.

Make some definitions. You know, like 'unlimited' means 'unlimited'. See if they sell any '3G wireless' when they tell you that streaming one movie will blow your 'unlimited' download budget.

Comments (0)Wireless Broadband

Broadband usage limits

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:49:21 PDT

Vote On Idea

I am disabled vet and use the internet to access the world outside my home. My broadband provider, Comcast, limits usage of the internet and threatens to disconnect service should you exceed the limit. If you watch a few sporting events or movies it is quite easy to exceed the limit. As such I must monitor usage and curtail my broadband access for fear of exceeding the limit. 100 mbps at a mininum and extended coverage are needed, but useless if you cannot use it.

Comments (0)Accessibility for People with Disabilities

Hurry, we are way behind

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:47:06 PDT

Vote On Idea

Please hurry up, we are way behind, it is critical to our economic survival

Comments (0)Deployment